Wanting to do something different, I recently went out to visit a few antique shops. I discovered many things wonderous and mundane as is typical. These three are not as they seem and I find them worthy of being shared.
First up is a desk with a secret. I haven’t seen one of these in a while. I’m not sure if it is my declining skill in finding them or there just hasn’t been one to be found. Whichever, here is the desk:
The main drawer bottoms are made of several board that over a few hundred years were not dimensionally stable:
An appropriately handsome gallery:
A lot of wood in the drawer fronts:
Nice prospect door:
Nothing within the prospect:
I reached in to see if there were finger notches to push out the letter boxes on either side of the door. I made a discovery:
An it turns out that the letter boxes come out the back:
There is also a less than obvious drawer above the door:
Next is the deception. This deception might have worked better when young and the doors hung true:
The press is actually an armoire:
And now, the mystery. I speak of this large, two piece press, shelves and drawers:
The upper section is shelved:
Drawers below:
Now, here’s the mystery: how do you access the area between the shelves and drawers? Storage space was always at a premium. I do not believe that the builder would have left the space unused. There are rough sawn board internally above the drawers so the space was not intended to be unused.
I don’t think the only access to the space is by lifting off the upper section. The carcass is pinned frame and panel construction so nothing comes off or is hinged.
My only conclusion is the access was gained by lifting out the bottom shelves of the upper section, the top over the lower section being left open. Those bottom shelves did seem loose and not part of the carcass. Inconvenient but workable. I didn’t have the time, patience or chutzpah to try so I don’t know.
Then the question is is it a secret or mystery or just something we don’t know because it is not now in common use?
Stephen Zerwas said:
I think the bottom piece was originally a trunk. Access to the top was through a hinged top which may have been replaced for the marriage of two different parts.
Mark B. Firley said:
If it is a married piece it is a old married couple.I think it is as built. The construction of the two pieces is identical. Same frame and panel construction. It is a bit short for a mule chest, a chest with drawers. No end handles and no indication there ever were.
I could be wrong.
potomacker said:
I think I know why the deceptive armoire doors have sagged over the years, and yet I cannot understand the reason for such a construction. Would not an armoire with drawers be more functional and provided more rigidity to the frame? did you check that this was original construction?